ESG data readiness for Australian portfolios
EDRATM is the diagnostic layer that tests whether an Australian portfolio's ESG data can withstand AASB S2, NGER, CER, and investor scrutiny — before the reporting cycle begins.
Known vs unknown
Five diagnostic questions we ask every Australian portfolio before scoring, certification, or AASB S2 disclosure.
The gap between data that exists and data that can be trusted.
Unknown gaps
Surfaces the data missing today before it becomes a reporting or disclosure failure.
Boundary inconsistencies
Metering, ownership, operator, and tenant boundaries that break consolidated reporting.
Readiness risk
Asset, utility, vendor, and team-level risk scored against the framework you must satisfy.
Where EDRATM+ is needed
Surgical view of where intervention is required before scoring or certification.
Built for the frameworks that govern Australian portfolios.
AASB S2 (Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards) · NGER · Safeguard Mechanism · CER · NABERS · GRESB · CDP.
For portfolios where ESG data complexity is already expensive.
Institutional portfolios
Where ESG data sits across operators, systems, vendors, meters, tenants, and asset teams.
High-scrutiny assets
Where energy, water, cooling, and tenant/operator boundaries cannot be treated casually.
Cross-regional owners
Investors and managers operating across regions, regulators, and reporting frameworks.
When readiness gaps are found, EDRA+ closes them.
Data discovery, utility/meter alignment, normalization, validation, and readiness packs — for benchmarking, certification, reporting, or investor review.
Request a Conversation →If your Australian ESG data feels complete, EDRATM tests whether it is usable.
We work with a limited number of Australian portfolios at a time, where data complexity justifies a diagnostic layer.